PUTRA, Achamd Yuliandri Erria (2023) Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Utusan Bebas Pada Tindak Pidana Perjudian (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 665K/Pid/2018). Masters thesis, UNIVERSITAS JENDERAL SOEDIRMAN.

	PDF (COVER) COVER-ACHMAD YULIANDI ERRIA PUTRA-TESIS-2023..pdf Download (857kB)
	PDF (LEGALITAS) LEGALITAS-ACHMAD YULIANDI ERRIA PUTRA-TESIS-2023.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB)
	PDF ABSTRAK-ACHMAD YULIANDI ERRIA PUTRA-TESIS-2023.pdf Download (521kB)
	PDF (BABI) BAB I-ACHMAD YULIANDI ERRIA PUTRA-TESIS-2023..pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 29 May 2024. Download (899kB)
	PDF (BABII) BAB II-ACHMAD YULIANDI ERRIA PUTRA-TESIS-2023..pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 29 May 2024. Download (988kB)
	PDF (BABIII) BAB III-ACHMAD YULIANDI ERRIA PUTRA-TESIS-2023..pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 29 May 2024. Download (526kB)
	PDF (BABIV) BAB IV-ACHMAD YULIANDI ERRIA PUTRA-TESIS-2023..pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (1MB)
	PDF (BABV) BAB V-ACHMAD YULIANDI ERRIA PUTRA-TESIS-2023..pdf Download (1MB)
	PDF (DaftarPustaka) DAFTAR PUSTAKA-ACHMAD YULIANDI ERRIA PUTRA-TESIS-2023.pdf Download (1MB)

Abstract

RINGKASAN ACHMAD YULIANDI ERRIA PUTRA, Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman, Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Putusan Bebas Pada Tindak Pidana Perjudian (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 665K/Pid/2018), Komisi Pembimbing, Prof. Dr. Hibnu Nugroho, S.H., M.Hum. Anggota, Dr. Budiyono, S.H.,M.Hum. Putusan pengadilan merupakan hasil musyawarah hakim berdasarkan penilaian dari surat dakwaan dihubungkan dengan segala sesuatu yang terbukti dalam pemeriksaan di sidang pengadilan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dasar pertimbangan Hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan bebas terhadap tindak pidana perjudian pada perkara Nomor 39/Pid.B/2018/PN. Pso dan menganalisisi dasar pertimbangan hukum Hakim Mahkamah Agung menolak permohonan kasasi dari pemohon kasasi dalam Putusan Nomor 665K/Pid./2018. Dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif, spesifikasi penelitian bersifat deskriptif. Pengumpulan data dengan studi kepustakaan, disajikan dalam bentuk teks naratif yang disusun secara sistematis, dan dianalisis secara normatif kualitatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan, maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa dasar pertimbangan Hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan bebas terhadap tindak pidana perjudian pada perkara Nomor 39/Pid.B/2018/PN. Pso, karena Hakim tidak memperoleh keyakinan mengenai kebenaran bahwa tindak pidana perjudian benar-benar terjadi dan para terdakwa yang bersalah melakukannya, dengan tidak terpenuhinya unsur ketiga dari tindak pidana perjudian yaitu ada taruhan. Artinya tindakan yang dilakukan oleh para terdakwa tidak memenuhi unsur adanya taruhan dalam permainan tersebut, karena tidak ada uang atau barang yang dipertaruhkan. Dasar pertimbangan hukum Hakim Mahkamah Agung menolak permohonan kasasi dari pemohon kasasi dalam Putusan Nomor 665K/Pid./2018. Alasan kasasi yang diajukan tidak dapat dibenarkan. Putusan Judex Facti Pengadilan Negeri Poso yang membebaskan Para Terdakwa dari segala dakwaan Penuntut Umum, telah tepat dan benar serta tidak salah dalam menerapkan peraturan hukum dalam mengadili perkara a quo; tidak terpenuhi salah satu unsur delik dan tidak adanya faktor untung-untungan, unsur kalah menang dalam layaknya suatu perjudian tidak terpenuhi, maka Para Terdakwa oleh Judex Facti dibebaskan dari segala dakwaan Penuntut Umum, maka permohonan kasasi dari Penuntut Umum tersebut ditolak. Kata kunci: Pertimbangan Hukum, Putusan Bebas, Tindak Pidana Perjudian SUMMARY ACHMAD YULIANDI ERRIA PUTRA, Master of Law Study Program, Postgraduate Program, Jenderal Soedirman University, Legal Considerations of Judges in Imposing Acquittal Decisions on Gambling Crimes (Study of Supreme Court Decisions Number 665K/Pid/2018), Advisory Commission, Prof. Dr. Hibnu Nugroho, S.H., M.Hum. Member, Dr. Budiyono, S.H., M.Hum. The court decision is the result of deliberation by judges based on the assessment of the indictment related to everything that is proven during the examination at the trial court. This study aims to analyze the basic considerations of the Judge in passing an acquittal against the crime of gambling in case Number 39/Pid.B/2018/PN. Pso and analyzing the basic legal considerations The Supreme Court Judge rejected the cassation request from the cassation applicant in Decision Number 665K/Pid./2018. With a normative juridical approach, the research specifications are descriptive in nature. Data collection by means of literature study, is presented in the form of narrative text which is arranged systematically, and analyzed normatively qualitatively. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that the basic considerations of the Judge in passing an acquittal against the crime of gambling in case Number 39/Pid.B/2018/PN. Pso, because the Judge did not obtain confidence regarding the truth that the crime of gambling actually occurred and the defendants were guilty of committing it, with the third element of the crime of gambling not being fulfilled, namely betting. This means that the actions taken by the defendants did not fulfill the element of betting in the game, because there was no money or goods at stake. Basic legal considerations The Supreme Court Judge rejected the cassation request from the cassation applicant in Decision Number 665K/Pid./2018. The reasons for the cassation put forward cannot be justified. The Judex Facti decision of the Poso District Court which acquitted the Defendants from all charges of the Public Prosecutor, was correct and correct and not wrong in applying the legal regulations in adjudicating the a quo case; If one of the elements of the offense is not fulfilled and there is no factor of chance, the element of winning and losing in a gambling game is not fulfilled, then the Defendants by Judex Facti are acquitted of all charges by the Public Prosecutor, then the appeal from the Public Prosecutor is rejected. Keywords: Cassation, Legal Considerations, Acquittal, Gambling Crime

Actions (login required)

View Item