NABILA, Shafira (2022) Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Merek Terkenal “CABERG” Berdasarkan Undang – Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 Tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis dalam Putusan Nomor 18/PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.

	PDF (Cover) COVER-Shafira Nabila-E1A018191-Skripsi-2022.pdf Download (254kB)
	PDF (Legalitas) LEGALITAS-Shafira Nabila-E1A018191-Skripsi-2022.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (267kB)
	PDF (ABSTRAK) ABSTRAK-Shafira Nabila-E1A018191-Skripsi-2022.pdf Download (563kB)
	PDF (BabI) BAB-I-Shafira Nabila-E1A018191-Skripsi-2022.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (496kB)
	PDF (BabII) BAB-II-Shafira Nabila-E1A018191-Skripsi-2022.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (679kB)
	PDF (BabIII) BAB-III-Shafira Nabila-E1A018191-Skripsi-2022.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (295kB)
	PDF (BabIV) BAB-IV-Shafira Nabila-E1A018191-Skripsi-2022.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (993kB)
	PDF (BabV) BAB-V-Shafira Nabila-E1A018191-Skripsi-2022.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (142kB)
	PDF (DaftarPustaka) DAFTAR PUSTAKA-Shafira Nabila-E1A018191-Skripsi-2022.pdf Download (396kB)

Abstract

Trademark registration in Indonesia adheres to the first to file basis, which means that in order for the rights of the trademark to be protected, a trademark must be registered first. Special for well-known marks, both registered or unregistered will still receive legal protection, as regulated in TRIPs Agreement and the Paris Convention. Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications has regulated that an application for registration of trademark must be rejected if it has similarities in principle or in its entirety to well-known marks, and trademark registration may also not be based on bad faith. The purpose of this study is to find out how the legal protection for well-known mark CABERG in verdict number18/PK/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2021 when viewed from Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. This study uses a normative juridical approach with descriptive analytical research specifications. The data source used is secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The data collection method was carried out by literature study, and then the data obtained were presented with narrative text, and the data analysis method used was a qualitative normative method. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be concluded that the cancellation of the respondent’s CABERG trademark in verdict number 18/PK/Pdt.sus-HKI/2021 is a repressive legal protection for applicant’s CABERG trademark. Based on the provisions in Article 21 verses (1) and (3) of Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications. The respondent’s CABERG trademark is proven to have similarities with the applicant’s CABERG trademark and the registration of the respondent’s CABERG trademark at the office of the Directorate General of Intellectual Property has been proven in bad faith, so it must be cancelled.

Actions (login required)

View Item