VALENTIN, Vena Ise (2024) Gender Differences in Language Features in Enola Holmes (2020): A Sociolinguistic Analysis. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.

	PDF (Cover) COVER-Vena Ise Valentin-J1A016066-Skripsi-2024.pdf Download (159kB)
	PDF (Legalitas) LEGALITAS-Vena Ise Valentin-J1A016066-Skripsi-2024.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (403kB)
	PDF (Abstrak) ABSTRAK-Vena Ise Valentin-J1A016066-Skripsi-2024.pdf Download (172kB)
	PDF (BabI) BAB-I-Vena Ise Valentin-J1A016066-Skripsi-2024.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 26 August 2025. Download (197kB)
	PDF (BabII) BAB-II-Vena Ise Valentin-J1A016066-Skripsi-2024.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 26 August 2025. Download (317kB)
	PDF (BabIII) BAB-III-Vena Ise Valentin-J1A016066-Skripsi-2024.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 26 August 2025. Download (190kB)
	PDF (BabIV) BAB-IV-Vena Ise Valentin-J1A016066-Skripsi-2024.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (415kB)
	PDF (BabV) BAB-V-Vena Ise Valentin-J1A016066-Skripsi-2024.pdf Download (175kB)
	PDF (DaftarPustaka) DAFTAR PUSTAKA-Vena Ise Valentin-J1A016066-Skripsi-2024.pdf Download (229kB)
	PDF (Lampiran) LAMPIRAN-Vena Ise Valentin-J1A016066-Skripsi-2024.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (330kB)

Abstract

This research entitled “Gender Differences In Language Features In Enola Holmes (2020): A Sociolinguistics Study” is aimed to analyse the form of language features used by the main characters that have different gender and to analyze the consistency of language features. This research uses qualitative method to analyse the data. The primary data is the dialogue uttered by the main characters, Enola and Tewksburry. To find the language features, the theory of women’s language features by Lakoff and men language features by Coates are used. The result of this research shows that Enola uses nine out of ten women’s language features which are lexical hedges with sixteen instance (12.21%), intensifiers with fourteen instances (10.7%), tag questions with seven instances (5.4%), empty adjectives with eight instances (6.11%), super polite with twenty two instances (16.8%), rising intonation with twenty eight instances (21.4%), avoid strong swear words with eight instances (6.11%), and emphatic stress with 25 instances (19.08%). On the other hand, Tewksburry employs seven out of ten women’s language features which are lexical hedges with thirteen instances (26%), intensifiers with seven instances (14%), tag questions with eight instances (16%), super polite with five instances (10%), rising intonation with four instances (8%), and emphatic stress with twelve instances (24%). For men’s language both of them also use it. Enola uses questions with twenty five instances (44%), minimal responses with four instances (7%), compliments with six instances (10.5%), strong swear words with one instance (1.5%) and commands with twenty one instances (37%). Tewksburry uses questions with twenty eight instances (49%), minimal responses with seven instances (12%), compliments with five instance (9%), swea strong words with two instances (3.5%) and commands with fiveteen instances (26%). The consistency showed that both Enola and Tewksburry are inconsistent of using the language features.

Actions (login required)

View Item