DINILLAH, Munadia Tsaqila (2025) Tinjauan Yuridis Pernyataan Bersama Tahun 2024 antara Indonesia dan Tiongkok dalam Kerja Sama Maritim Berdasarkan United Nations Convention On The Law Of The Sea 1982. Skripsi thesis, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.

	PDF (Cover) COVER-Munadia Tsaqila Dinillah-E1A021044-2025.pdf Download (472kB)
	PDF (Legalitas) LEGALITAS-Munadia Tsaqila Dinillah-E1A021044-2025.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (693kB)
	PDF (Abstrak) ABSTRAK-Munadia Tsaqila Dinillah-E1A021044-2025.pdf Download (668kB)
	PDF (BabI) BAB I-Munadia Tsaqila Dinillah-E1A021044-2025.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 September 2026. Download (206kB)
	PDF (BabII) BAB II-Munadia Tsaqila Dinillah-E1A021044-2025.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 September 2026. Download (223kB)
	PDF (BabIII) BAB III-Munadia Tsaqila Dinillah-E1A021044-2025.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 September 2026. Download (703kB)
	PDF (BabIV) BAB IV-Munadia Tsaqila Dinillah-E1A021044-2025.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (369kB)
	PDF (BabV) BAB V-Munadia Tsaqila Dinillah-E1A021044-2025.pdf Download (594kB)
	PDF (DaftarPustaka) DAFTAR PUSTAKA-Munadia Tsaqila Dinillah-E1A021044-2025.pdf Download (159kB)

Abstract

Maritime cooperation between Indonesia and China has entered a new phase with the issuance of a Joint Statement in 2024. Although non-binding, the statement contains the phrase “..in areas of overlapping claims..”, which raises concerns about its potential legal implications for Indonesia’s position in the South China Sea dispute. This study aims to analyze China’s ten-dash line claim over the South China Sea under the framework of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) 1982, and to examine the legal consequences of the maritime joint statement signed between the Governments of Indonesia and China. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings of this study indicate that the ten-dash line claim is inconsistent with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS)1982, specifically Articles 56, 57, 74, 76, and 83, which pertain to the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf. This contradiction has been affirmed by the ruling of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) 2016, which explicitly rejected China’s nine-dash line claim. The legal implication of the phrase ..in areas of overlapping claims..” used in the joint statement may be interpreted as an implicit recognition of China’s claim, particularly with respect to Indonesia’s Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in the North Natuna Sea.

Actions (login required)

View Item