MULIAWAN, Rayhan Fausta (2025) The In Absentia Trial in Corruption Crimes (Study of the Verdict: 103/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN Sby). Skripsi thesis, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman.

	PDF (Cover) COVER-RAYHAN FAUSTA M-E1B021029-SKRIPSI.pdf Download (226kB)
	PDF (Legalitas) LEGALITAS- RAYHAN FAUSTA M-E1B021029-SKRIPSI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (377kB)
	PDF (Abstrak) ABSTRAK-RAYHAN FAUSTA M-E1B021029-SKRIPSI.pdf Download (277kB)
	PDF (BabI) BAB I-RAYHAN FAUSTA M-E1B021029-SKRIPSI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 3 December 2026. Download (324kB)
	PDF (BabII) BAB II-RAYHAN FAUSTA M-E1B021029-SKRIPSI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 3 December 2026. Download (343kB)
	PDF (BabIII) BAB III-RAYHAN FAUSTA M-E1B021029-SKRIPSI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only until 3 December 2026. Download (273kB)
	PDF (BabIV) BAB IV-RAYHAN FAUSTA M-E1B021029-SKRIPSI.pdf Restricted to Repository staff only Download (592kB)
	PDF (BabV) BAB V-RAYHAN FAUSTA M-E1B021029-SKRIPSI.pdf Download (274kB)
	PDF (DaftarPustaka) DAFTAR PUSTAKA-RAYHAN FAUSTA M-E1B021029-SKRIPSI.pdf Download (198kB)

Abstract

The application of justice in absentia in corruption cases is an exception to the principle of the presence of the defendant in the criminal procedure law. The absence of the defendant is often an obstacle in the judicial process, so arrangements regarding in absentia are needed to ensure the effectiveness of law enforcement and legal certainty for the community. This study aims to analyze judicial procedures with defendants in absentia in corruption crimes and examine the judge's legal considerations in imposing a verdict against defendants who are tried in absentia in Decision Number 103/Pid.Sus-TPK/2023/PN Sby. This type of research is a normative juridical research using a statutory approach, a conceptual approach, and a case approach, and is analyzed qualitatively. Based on the results of the research, the application of justice in absentia in cases of corruption crimes is in accordance with the provisions of Article 38 of Law Number 31 of 1999 jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption, although there are still weaknesses in the consideration of judges who are less progressive in applying the principle of substantive justice. The panel of judges emphasizes more on formal procedural aspects rather than law enforcement that is oriented towards a deterrent effect for perpetrators of corruption crimes.

Actions (login required)

View Item